Sushil Kumar v. Raj Kumar

2024:PHHC:053687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.2382 of 2024 Date of Decision: 22.04.2024 Sushil Kumar ...Revisionist-Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.

***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision-petition, while submitting that the petitioner intends to avail the appropriate, efficacious and alternative remedy, as may be permissible to him under law. Resultantly, the revision-petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn accordingly.

22.04.2024 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable:

No NEETU RANI 2024.04.22 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD