Satya Narain And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

681 2nd case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-2773-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: May 24, 2022 Satya Narain and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition was filed in the year 2003, inter alia, for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned condition No.1 of the appointment letters issued to the petitioners to the extent that the petitioners have been appointed purely on ad hoc basis.

2.

Petition was admitted on 20.02.2003.

3.

When called out for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that by sheer effluxion of time and pendency of the writ petition for more than 18 years before this Court, it has been rendered infructuous and/or the petitioners seem to have lost interest in pursuing the same. 4.

Be that as it may, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application in case, any cause of action still survives.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE May 24, 2022 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No


    

   VANDANA 2022.05.25 21:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document