Vijay Sethi v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH



CWP No. 8929 of 2024 Date of Decision:23.04.2024 Vijay Sethi ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchita Garg, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to issue him passport.

2.

Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to approach passport authority. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4.

If the petitioner appears before passport authority on the appointed day, the Court is sanguine of the fact that passport authority would look into his grievance.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 23.04.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.23 05:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document