Sushil Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

CRM-M-37687-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37687-2015 Date of Decision: December 22, 2015 Sushil Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Ravi Gakhar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl.A.G.Haryana.

Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 8 to 11.

.......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Raj Kumar of Police Post Krishna Gate, Police Station Thanesar City, District Kurukshetra, submits that vide order, dated 12.09.2015, passed by the Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra, Special Investigation Team consisting of Dy.S.P.,Kurukshetra, MEENU 2015.12.23 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-37687-2015 -2Insepctor, CIA Staff and S.I.Raj Kumar of Police Post Krishna Gate, Police Station Thanesar City, District Kurukshetra, has been constituted to investigate the present case. He further submits that at the earliest preferably within six months, the special investigation team would conclude the investigation of the present case.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of and in case the investigating Agency fails to honour the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the State, then the petitioner may be relegated to move an application to revive the present petition. Learned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel representing respondent Nos.6, 8 to 11, has no objection to the above prayer.

Ordered accordingly.

December 22, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.23 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh