Deepak Bhardwaj v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-M-37888-2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37888-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2015 Deepak Bhardwaj ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate for Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Ved Singh, Police Station, Sector 40, Gurgaon, submits that in compliance of the interim directions issued by this Court, vide order dated 18.08.2015 the petitioner has joined the investigation. Few dowry articles have been recovered but the MEENU 2015.09.29 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-37888-2014 (O&M) -2gold ornaments, as alleged by the informant, have not been recovered.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and no more required for custodial interrogation, therefore, interim directions issued by this Court on various dates in the present case are made absolute.

The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.P.C.

September 28, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.29 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh