Kuldeep @ Jabu v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37809-2015(O&M) Date of decision : 17.11.2015 KULDEEP @ JABU ....... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ....... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI ***

Present:

Mr. Kartar Singh Malik-I, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No.364 dated 24.08.2014, under Sections 307, 341, 34 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act(later added Section 325 IPC), registered at Police Station City Rohtak, District Rohtak.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.08.2014 and the complainant and the victim in their examination have exculpated him. Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Subhash, has accepted this factual submission but states that the Forensic examination of the gun seized from the petitioner and the bullets recovered from the body of the injured match. She has, however, stated that the petitioner has otherwise clean antecedents.

Be that as it may, without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the period of custody, I do not deem it appropriate to deny the concession of bail to the SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.11.18 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-37809-2015(O&M) -2present petitioner. Let him be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Petition stands disposed of.

Since the main case has been decided, the Criminal Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 17, 2015 sunita SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.11.18 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh