Robin Bansal v. State Of Punjab




    
     

 Date of decision: 17th September, 2015  Robin Bansal

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No.2.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Robin Bansal in case FIR No.111 dated 27.09.2014 registered at Police Station City9II Mansa under Sections 498A/406 IPC.

Vide order dated 05.11.2014 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the parties have settled the dispute amicably regarding which an amount of
16.00 lacs has been paid by the petitioner9husband which has been received by the complainant/respondent No.2 wife and which is duly acceded and accepted by Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate representing the complainant wife and is not even dispute by learned State counsel, in view of which the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 05.11.2014 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. $  "
%   "&'(&)*&+ #

,  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court