Darshana v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.37866 of 2015 Date of decision : 05.11.2015 Smt.Darshana ....... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI ***
Present:
Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ***
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner was illegally arrested and beaten in the lock up and in this connection she has moved a representation dated 22.08.2015( Annexure P-2 ). He states that at this stage the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to look into the the said representation and take whatever action he deems fit thereon within any reasonable time.
I find this to be a fair request.
In the circumstances this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation (Annexure P-2) and take what ever action he deems necessary under intimation to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) November 05, 2015 JUDGE sunita SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.11.06 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh