Prakash v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-18396-2026 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.247 CRM-M-18396-2026 Decided on : 29.04.2026 Prakash ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present :
Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
*** , J (ORAL)
!
" # # $%$
&
'()"* +%$%$,
$%-&.-
.-!. "
&
/ *
0 $ !
+%$%$,( 0&
1 1
1
&
0
11
$%, 0
'() 2
& 0
CRM-M-18396-2026 2
1
Learned counsel contends that mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act were not complied with at the time of alleged search and seizure. ( & &0
3
! 4 0 &
& &
5 $+% $%$,
5)33++%3$%$, -
3 . &0
0
+%$%$,
7
0 8
& 0 &0 #
0
1 & & #
&
&7
& 1
2
1
# 7
& 0
& & &0
00
&
However, she has not controverted the fact that the the petitioner is first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
*
0 % 0
$8
8
3
&
& &
5 8
0 8
8 & 0
0 #
0
1 & &
CRM-M-18396-2026 3
1
&
1 &
$ 5
( , )
9
1
:& 65 #
0 &&
&
0
&
$5
(
+ ( 1 &
1
& &
& & ; &
5 ;
;5<
(
&
6
0 00
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No = & >? ;"