High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37993/2014allowed

Lalit Goyal v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-20Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-37993-2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37993-2014 Date of Decision:- 20.09.2016 Lalit Goyal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Talwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.401 dated 29.08.2014, registered at Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 and 182 IPC.

Vide order dated 10.11.2014, the anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner to enable him to settle the disputes with the complainant and the parties were directed to appear before the mediation centre of this Court. As per the report of the mediator, the parties have not been able to Naresh Kumar 2016.09.24 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh resolve their disputes.

CRM-M-37993-2014 -2Today, the matter heard at length and it has been transpired that there is a dispute with regard to recovery of gold ornaments. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the gold ornaments are in the custody of the complainant, as the petitioner does not have any gold ornaments as of today. At the same time, learned counsel for the complainant states that all the articles which were given by family members of the complainant to the petitioner was never handed over to her.

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 10.11.2014, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a surety of `5 lacs before the trial Court. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. September 20, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.09.24 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh