Amar Singh v. State Bank Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38841-2016 Date of decision: 05.12.2018 Amar Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State Bank of India ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the respondent. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.
Perusal of file shows that on the previous date i.e. 14.08.2018 also, the petitioner had gone un-represented. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant petition.
Resultantly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
December 05, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.12.06 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document