← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37965/2015disposed of

Gurcharan Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR

2016-02-01Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages



         

 Date of decision: 1st February, 2016  Gurcharan Singh and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !"  #  # 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. M.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deep Singh, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 #$% "& Report dated 24.11.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sardulgarh has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Mohinder Kaur, Member Panchayat Bhura Singh and the accused/petitioner No.1 namely Gurcharan Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise Ex.CX has been arrived at between the complainant and accused/petitioner No.1 voluntarily, out of their free will, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.02 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in '()* #(*+, - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4!

%5&   %4(6(*)7& 5 and '8079(*3/4 #(*+, )*3 .,/4: - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4!

 %&   %4(6(*)7&  $ the prayer made in the petition is partly allowed qua petitioner No.1, proceedings by way of FIR No.69 dated 26.10.2015 registered at Police Station Jaurkian, District Mansa under Sections 452/380/427/506/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua petitioner No.1 are quashed.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed qua petitioner No.1 and dismissed qua petitioner No.2. %  #&  

/240)4;$

  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.02 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court