← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/3898/2016disposed of

Arun Kumar @ Banty & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2016-02-10Mr. Justice S.C. Malte2 pages

CRM-M-3898-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3898-2016 Date of Decision: February 10, 2016 Arun @ Banty and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Petitioners in person with Ms. Mannat Anand, Advocate, for Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to protect lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. The petitioners contend that they being major, have solemnized their marriage in accordance with law. They further submit that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are not accepting their marriage and adamant to separate them from each other by resorting to illegal means. They further submit PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.10 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-3898-2016 that in view of the imminent danger to their lives and liberty, they have already moved a representation (Annexure P-2) before respondent No. 2/Superintendent of Police, Panipat. Notice of motion was issued.

In response thereof, learned counsel for the State and counsel representing respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have appeared. Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners has produced four photographs of the marriage, which are taken on record.

Keeping in view the seriousness of the matter but without going into the validity of the marriage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to take action as warranted by law on the representation moved by the petitioners and in the meantime to issue necessary orders to ensure that no harm is caused to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 10, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.10 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document