Amit Gupta & ORS. v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-38235-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-38235-2014 Date of Decision: February 19, 2016 Amit Gupta and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Bikramjit Aroura, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral):

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Raj Kumar of Police Station, Sector 14, Panchkula, submits that after filing of the charge-sheet (challan) before learned Trial Court on 3.8.2015, an application under Section 239, Cr.P.C., has been presented by the petitioners for their discharge, which is PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.20 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-38235-2014 fixed for consideration on 25.2.2016.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to take all the pleas before learned Court below in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 19, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.20 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document