High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/38195/2015allowed

Gursahib Singh v. State Of Punjab

2017-02-09Mr. Justice Arun Palli2 pages

CRM-M-38195-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-38195-2015 Date of decision : 09.02.2017 Gursahib Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Randhawa, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent.

Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate, for the complainant.

AMOL RATTAN SINGH J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks bail after being arrested pursuant to a case, FIR No.112 dated 10.01.2011, having been registered against him and his co-accused, at Police Station Mallanwala, District Ferozepur, for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 325, 323, 326, 336, 341, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25, 27, 54, and 59 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner reiterates what he had stated on 21.01.2017, to the effect that as regards the single injury which was declared dangerous to life to one person on the opposite side, the matter has been compromised with the said injured, Sarabjit Singh. He further submits that a cross-version to the FIR was also lodged by a person on the side of the petitioner and both the sides have now filed applications under Section 319 Cr.P.C. before the learned trial Court, which are still pending. As regards the compromise arrived at between the aforesaid Virendra Singh Adhikari 2017.02.14 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-38195-2015 -2Sarabjit Singh and the petitioner, a copy of the compromise deed is annexed as Annexure P-2 with the application bearing CRM-M-1683 of 2017. Today, Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate, has appeared for Mr. G.S.Saini, Advocate, who is appearing for the aforesaid Sarabjit Singh, as per the power of attorney already on record. Learned counsel does not dispute the fact that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Keeping in view the entire circumstances and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since July, 2015 and the trial is not near conclusion, he would be admitted to bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) 09.02.2017 JUDGE adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Virendra Singh Adhikari 2017.02.14 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh