Sunil @ Shubham v. State Of Haryana
!
" #$%$ & '
( )(
*+&$, - *.+/.
(((( $ $ & 1 2 1%+% *
!
&
(((( %4 &" &
'
56 ( ** 7
* 7
(
91 ,:
!"
# $ $$$!""$%&' ( )*+, +) ,+, ! ,+ - .* ./0+,0,0)+1 0+20,)& $ !"
,
! %&'#$ 333 ( !3 &#$ 0+ +.
,+, #$$ $ & 33 3#2 *#$
4 3'!5- ( $33 '!5-!$3 ("$3#$3
'!5-!6!#" !"3 78!6!# 3 $! "3 $!'3! !3!
49!#3$$! : $ %&'$33 &6!(
!3#!!3"6! ,, +) ,+, 4!$%&'#$!
0,0 .* ./)+1& # 3! 0+,& # 4 # ,) +) ,+, : 3 $ # :3$$33 4 ;!$ $" #$"$3 3 ;!$ " +0 ,+,1 $$"
3 " ! $$""
# $
<!! $"" #3 ! ! 3 ( !"5 # "$"
# ! 33 ,, + ,+,1 "
! '
.))+. ,+,) '
.2 2, ,+,)#"
!"$ $!" !"3 # !#"$"" ! !"3 " "$" 3 !#
"$""
! .
!!"3 3"
! #!"3!$
;
3 !#"$ ""
!#333$## #3 ! ! 3 " $ " "
! : !!"3!0*!#+0 #"=3 !! !#
)
$!!$ "" 3 ! "$ ""
! 4!"3 !#" $!3$$ $!$3 !"3"
!0*!#+0#"=3 4! !#!#! +0 +03 * +1 +.
,+,1 &! 3#" ( ! !3$
4 $#!" !"" " " !
7.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC 695 has held as under:
"Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While
) deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice." *
4 >" !3 ! +0 +2 ,+,.< 2 "
+, /$ *.
$=.
>%( *
!
.
%.
1$0$& , 44 , (
!
)?#! 3 3 " ! $ ! !&
/
4#! $3 $ #$!3"
"!$ !!! 3$!$$!"" # ! # " $ $! " "
!
$ # ""!$"?! " !?! $ ($" =3 +
&""!"
!$+2 3 !! ##"!
( )(
* 7
:
@$? A?( @" A?(