← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20206/2024allowed

Jagdeep Kumar v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2024-09-17Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat2 pages

CRM-M-20206-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20206-2024 Date of decision: 17.09.2024 JAGDEEP KUMAR

...Petitioners

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT

Present:

Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of an FIR No.42 dated 24.05.2023 under Sections 170, 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Mehtiana, District Hoshiarpur (Anneuxre P-1), alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

2.

Vide order dated 24.04.2024 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise (Annexure P-2).

3.

Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hoshiarpur and got their statements recorded. Report dated 03.06.2024 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. Raman Kumar 2024.09.18 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-20206-2024 -24. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners.

6.

Resultantly, FIR No.42 dated 24.05.2023 under Sections 170, 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Mehtiana, District Hoshiarpur (Anneuxre P-1), alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 17.09.2024 JUDGE raman Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Raman Kumar 2024.09.18 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document