Vijay v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3941-2018 Date of decision: 04.04.2018 Vijay

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. P.P. Chahar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Naresh Dilawari, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 537 dated 13.12.2017 under Sections 376 & 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sonipat, District Sonipat.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that during the pendency of the proceedings the matter stands compromised. He further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Usha Sharma, confirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and the compromise. He further submits that the department is in the process of filing a cancellation report.

Satyawan 2018.04.05 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-3941-2018 -2In view of the fact that the matter stands settled amicably between the parties and further the petitioner has joined investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 02.02.2018, granting interim bail to the petitioner, is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 04.04.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.04.05 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh