High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39346/2016allowed

Pardeep v. State Of Haryana

2016-11-10Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39346-2016 Date of decision: 10.11.2016 Pardeep

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case bearing FIR No. 37 dated 11.02.2016, under Sections 346, 363, 366-A, 376 IPC and 4, 11, 12 of POSCO Act, registered at Police Station Beri, District Jhajjar. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that an FIR came to be lodged under the aforesaid sections pursuant to which the petitioner Pardeep was arrested on 24.02.2016. Statement of both the complainant and the prosecutrix have been recorded in which a categoric statement has been made by the complainant that no one enticed his sister and she was not confined anywhere nor any wrong has been committed with her and the same statement has been made by the prosecutrix. Notice of motion.

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana has appeared on behalf of respondent-State and contested the bail application. In view of the fact that both the complainant and the prosecutrix have deposed that no wrong has been committed by the Satyawan 2016.11.11 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-39346-2016 -2petitioner and the petitioner has been in custody since 24.02.2016 and the trial of the case will take long time, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody furthermore. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/learned trial Court concerned.

Petition stands disposed of.

10.11.2016 (JAISHREE THAKUR) sp JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2016.11.11 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh