Rahul Yadav And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-394 of 2016 Date of decision : February 23, 2016 Rahul Yadav and another ....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Jasjeet Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Report dated 2.2.2016 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur has been received after recording statements of accused Rahul Yadav and Ranjit Singh as well as complainant Kulwant Singh and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 117 dated 28.9.2015 registered at Police Station City Gurdaspur, under DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2016.02.25 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-394 of 2016 -2sections 420/34 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioners.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 23, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2016.02.25 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.