Ramesh Lamberdar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-38509 of 2015 Date of Decision: November 16, 2015 Ramesh Lamberdar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Chander Pal Tiwana Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.108 dated 14.04.2015 under Sections 420, 467 468, 471, 120-B and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Civil Line Kaithal, District Kaithal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that FIR in the present case has been got registered by Kuldeep Singh by stating that his wife Savitri Devi purchased a plot vide sale deed dated 30.04.2014 and thereafter, she transferred the plot in the name of the complainant vide sale deed dated 29.01.2015. As per the allegations, Mahender Singh and Suresh Kumar got executed the sale deed in favour of Sunil Kumar on 04.10.2012 by impersonation and the present VINEET GULATI 2015.11.17 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-38509 of 2015 -2petitioner Ramesh Lamberdar was the attesting witness. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and nature and gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail as he identified a wrong person at the time of execution of sale deed. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

November 16, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.11.17 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh