High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39416/2016allowed

Kuldeep Yadav Anb ORS v. State Of Haryana

2017-02-20Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-39416 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-39416 of 2016 Date of decision : 20.02.2017 Kuldeep Yadav and others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. S.S. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Raje Ram Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Reply filed by the State in the Court today, is taken on record. Quashing of FIR No. 206 dated 04.09.2013 under Sections 406/498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Kurukshetra, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 04.02.2016 (P-2) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner on 01.12.2012. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained. F.I.R was registered against the petitioners for harassing and humiliating respondent No. 2 on the pretext of bringing insufficient dowry. However, the matter has now been duly compromised, vide compromise deed dated 04.02.2016 (P-2) In compliance of order dated 07.11.2016, report dated 16.12.2016 of Civil Judge (Jr. Dvin) cum Judl. Magistrate 1st Class, GAURAV ARORA 2017.02.22 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-39416 of 2016 Kurukshetra has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of parties have been recorded. The complainant stated that the matter stands compromised between the parties and she does not want to proceed further against the accused and has no objection, if the present F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. To the same effect is the joint statement given by the petitioners. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 16.12.2016 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 206 dated 04.09.2013 under Sections 406/498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Kurukshetra, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners. The petition stands disposed of.

20.02.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.02.22 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh