Saroj Kumari And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
    

 Date of decision: 15th January, 2016  Saroj Kumari and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Ms. Anju Bala, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

Respondents No.4 to 7 in person.

 "
#$ !% Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Karam Singh, Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula, submits that the boy and girl both have made statements before the police that threat to their life and personal liberty is no more there and has placed on record the statements.

Krishan Lal (father of the girl), Sarvi Devi (mother), Sonu (brother) and Sanju (cousin brother) respondents No.4 to 7 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.18 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    respectively have come present and have submitted that they have no objection to this relationship and shall not intervene in the same. Faced with this situation, learned counsel representing the petitioners on instructions from her client has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition.

Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

$  "
%   &'(&)* #

+
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.18 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court