Gurjant Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH
 

(O&M) Date of decision: 18.02.2022 Gurjant Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

   

  






       



   
 

****  





!

   !       

 "          #      $  $      %  %"                              & '  ()   

 %       % %     "  $               *+ & ,-   '- ).

')'(   /00  1)' +

  '.   $   
%   2 

 $ $  "

3 ') )4 ')'(  #  $ "  %  %          # $  
   % %  %     $ 

 5 6 %

 %


 #  % $$  
%   

 %  %    7
   % %  %

+ #   $    $ % %  "         $%    %     $     % %$   "   $   # "  %    #       (0 )( ')'(   "

     %%   #          #   %%" $%      #    #!   %  $   %   #  #    #    %        % $      & ,  
%  

 #   ! 

2 "    %    % $          %  %%    *+ & ,-   '- ).

')'(  

+      %  %    

2 89% :       $% 2   3

7 ;  +

 3  <')(-=()  -)'   %   "21. Turning to the first point, we are of the considered opinion that the issue is no more res integra. In Narmada Bai Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. (2011) 5 SCC 79, in paragraph 64, this Court restated that it is trite law that the accused persons do not have a say in the matter of appointment of Investigating Agency. Further, the accused persons cannot choose as to which Investigating Agency must investigate the offence committed by them. Paragraph 64 of this decision reads thus:- >64. ..... It is trite law that accused persons do not have a say in the matter of appointment of an investigation agency. The accused persons cannot choose as to which investigation agency must investigate the alleged offence committed by them."

                   & $  %   $   #        % $       % #%  "   9  ? #     $%    %        

+ $     $   89% :        "  "   $   $  +  "

+ #      $       $  " $

 

!

"

 18.02.2022  @  A !B CA& @  %B CA&