← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18426/2025dismissed

Jaswinder Singh @ Jassi v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-04-02Ms. Justice Kirti Singh4 pages

 

     



 !"#!$%&%"'( )) 

  

 

!"!

## $% & '

 $# !(

( *+,) ,- , ! *   +,+-.

)/ 0+

! "+3 4+".

.

"

5+6   ,+-.

)/ 0+



- , .) + 

+8

-)



'2++ 8+ +9+ :

"+:!2+ + +.

;.

0+! 

)+)   <

=" >.

;?<>.

@

' <-+

+)))



'

$$ 0>.

!) +  +

3

42+!.

 %+A -:+.

"

5+6 



+ ( )"0) 2

+1 

                 !"#$ %%%%&   '$  & ( 

   

    %%%%             )  *  ++ %,"  -' (    %%%% ,,     %%%% ./      '0 12  .     %%%% 2 .#3,(4( *+ (+ + ( 56( ./,#,%%%%2 7 

+ (+  (+

  2 

   ,#.,,#, (8 49  1 :

  (

  + ) ( +() +-&2   +9 +() &( ;  <+ = &2

 >   726   ' 2

+  

) 2:

' & +(

 > 2(     )  2 2 ' '      72  >72 6;   $$2   )(  0+    )(  0+ ;  2   6+   726*2 *  

   7   -  0     (        )     ' &'' &

(

(

?@AB 

    ?8  

 A   B  C$  >'+ . ..C: 9+

4 (  06,,$.,$,#,D ; B+ !-

!"63

.

+9)  8+!.

1+-!-y implicated in the present FIR on the statement of the father of the prosecutrix, alleging that the petitioner had aided the main accused in enticing away his daughter on the false promise of marriage. It is submitted that the prosecutrix-respondent No.3 and the main accused, Rahul, were well-acquainted with each other and intended to marry, but faced opposition from her parents. Infact, apprehending threat from her family, respondent No.3 along with co-accused Rahul had approached the Court seeking protection by way of CRWP-12542 of 2024. Learned counsel contends that other than the sweeping allegation leveled against the petitioner, there is no material on record that points towards his involvement in the alleged occurrence.

 4 (  -+ + !- +!

,-- +!

!-

/23 -8

(( !) !"63 !!

3+) !-

!"63 2 + !(0 !

"!

+--9+

#28 !+

,+!

+0 /-8

-/)

!!

0

B+ned State counsel while placing reliance on the status report dated 24.04.2025 submits that during the course of investigation, it was found that the accused persons, in furtherance of their common intention, enticed the prosecutrix on the assurance that accused Rahul would marry her, and on such false pretext of marriage, accused Rahul established

 physical relations with her. L+ + !- 1"2 !"63 !+3

( !0" = ,+!

0 ))

;

'.

,2

.

!2 2+) !"(( ) 0+!

( !0"

-/-) !(0 +--9+

/.

,2 - 3+

+00"!)

+3-8 +2"-

+!)

; ;  .

( 0-+3+

( 0)

9!

+)

   .

)"

!+ /+!

( 0!!

-+, 

1"2 9292) !"6!C"

!!

+--9)

00" -+)

!+

%.

3+

+00"!)

2+) ) -+

, 2 !+3 3.

-+)

)9

0+!.

A.

  )+) ;

;?<>.

.

 <>.

 <>.

@<;>.

@

'

.

?.

.

@

3!

0  2 !(0

( 0

-) 3+

+00"!) ( !0" =.

!"63 ) 2

.

( !0" = ,+!

))

6 !

+

 :+ .

!2 6

#2+1.

!+

,+!

"- 3+-8 !3 !!)

@  00

9-8.

+ !-

 )!

!

)!/

6 )

0!!

2  " B+ !-

+) +/3 3+) + !-.

!"63

!

)!/

0!!

- ? +)

/+- !"63 !!

3+) !-

(+ ! 

 (.

!(0 +--9+

+00"!) +2"-

( !0" =

1+-! (=

3+ +9.

-/--)

!+ +2"- +-!

+00"!)

 

( + / !="+- +!!+"-

( !0" = !+3

( !0" = 0 ))

;

'

+-!

/.

-8 ( 0-+3+

( 0)

9!

+)

0+!.

6" 2 +-!

+00"!)



-+

, 2 !+3 3.

,2 02.

!)

3

@ 

,

!0"!!

.

2  "

0-

0!!

 ,/.

2

0)

+((+ 61 +-  " -

+(( ( +

.

,2 +-  "

0)

)0

!+3 )+8 00

9-8.

!+

!( !)

+1 !+ 3!  )-!!

!+8

2

6!/) 2

+6 / !2+-- 6

!") +!

=(!!

3

0+!  

!0--+ "!

+((- 0+

<!>.

8.

+-!

!+ )!

!( !)

1 - ,     /0%1 . 

  :+ 23! 3!0&/!4%'560!&"'!7 ( !&6"

23! 3!00!/"0 81!

( !&6"