← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRSA/3066/2001dismissed

Moti Ram v. Murti Mandir Bhageshwar Mahadev Ji Mahar

2015-01-05Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh2 pages



        

 !" #

$%  

 Date of decision: 5th January, 2015  Moti Ram  Appellant

Versus

Murti Mandir Bhageshwar Mahadev Ji Maharaj  Respondent  &  '(  $  $ 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. J.K. Khetarpal, Advocate for the applicant.appellant.

Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.



 $)* (+ CM No.15464.C of 2014 This is an application under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC for impleading Legal Representatives of deceased.appellant Moti Ram, which is duly supported by death certificate (Annexure A.8). The same is not opposed by the other side.

The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the LRs of appellant Moti Ram, as mentioned in para No.3 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record purely for the purpose of RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.03 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 pursuing this appeal and the same shall not be used for any collateral purpose.

Amended memo of parties already filed is taken on record. Mr. J.K. Khetarpal, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of all these legal representatives of the appellant.  RSA No.3066 of 2001 (O&M) Learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal.

Ordered accordingly.

*  $+   " ,"-.)

  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.03 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court