← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/3882/2015disposed of

Danish Akhtar Ali @ Rahul v. State Of Punjab And Others

2015-12-21Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages



        

 Date of decision: 21st December, 2015  Danish Akhtar Ali @ Rahul

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

Respondents        !  ! 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

  Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !"#  $ Complainant James Shergill son of Gurnam Das has come present personally and has been identified by ASI Taranjit Singh, Police Station Focal Point, Ludhiana. The complainant has stated that since his daughter Meenu Rani respondent No.2 has solemnized marriage with petitioner Danish Akhtar Ali @ Rahul son of Mohammad Shahed on her own and that she is a major and that the parties have since effected compromise and he has no objection if the matter is allowed to be compounded on the basis of this settlement and has lend credence to his affidavit which has been placed on record by him. Report dated 03.06.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.22 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 statements of respondent No.2 Meenu Rani and the petitioner namely Danish Akhtar Ali @ Rahul, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the affidavit filed on behalf of the complainant who has come present, being a pure case of run away couple who have solemnized marriage, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'( !&()* + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 3 and %6.57&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-28 + !,',-  .

(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 9 #$   #2&4&('5$  " the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.36 dated 23.01.2015 registered at Police Station Focal Point, Ludhiana under Sections 363/366A IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioner are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !$   -:-40-2 "

  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.22 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court