Sonia Bajaj v. State Of Punjab & ANR




    
    

 Date of decision: 4th March, 2015  Sonia Bajaj  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another  Respondents     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. M.S. Virdi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent No.2.

 #
$% "& Report of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dera Bassi, based on the submissions made by the parties before the Court, has been received. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.259 dated 09.09.2010 registered at RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.09 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) under Sections 380/448/511 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

%  #
&   '()*$

+
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.09 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court