Nitin Bansal v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38898-2017 Date of decision: - 15.02.2018 Nitin Bansal .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU

Present:

Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.

**** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU , J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in pursuance of order dated 27.10.2017 of this Court, the petitioner has already been joined the investigation.

The above fact is duly acknowledged by learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Pritpal Singh, by submitting that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this case.. In view of above, the interim order dated 27.10.2017 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present petition stands disposed of. ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) February 15, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reportable?

No Whether reasoned/speaking?

No Naresh Kumar 2018.02.16 09:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh