Vickey @ Vikash v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

(1) Criminal Misc. No.M-38918 of 2017 .....

Date of decision:14.11.2017 Vickey alias Vikash .....Petitioner v.

State of Haryana .....Respondent ....

(2) Criminal Misc. No.M-39316 of 2017 .....

Nitin .....Petitioner v.

State of Haryana .....Respondent ....

(3) Criminal Misc. No.M-39325 of 2017 .....

Ashish .....Petitioner v.

State of Haryana .....Respondent ....

(4) Criminal Misc. No.M-39351 of 2017 .....

Ajay and another .....Petitioners v.

State of Haryana .....Respondent ....

Present:

Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioners in Cr. Misc. Nos. M-38918 of 2017 and 39316 of 2016.

Cr. Misc. Nos.M-38918 of 2017 [2] Mr. Devender Arya, Advocate for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.M-39325 of 2017.

Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioners in Cr. Misc. No.M-39351 of 2017.

Mr. B.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This order will dispose of the above mentioned four petitions filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.276 dated 7.5.2017 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 365, 506 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Khedki Daula, District Gurugram.

Notice of motion has been issued in these cases. Mr. B.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested these petitions.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State and have gone through the record.

The present petitioners have already joined the investigation. As stated they are not required for any custodial interrogation nor anything is to be recovered from them. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to custody.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present cases; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing

Cr. Misc. Nos.M-38918 of 2017 [3] any opinion on the merits of the cases, I find merit in these petitions and the same are allowed. The interim orders dated 13.10.2017 passed by this Court granting interim bail to the petitioners are made absolute. However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. November 14, 2017.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No