Sandeep Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ANR




    
     

 Date of decision: 14th September, 2015  Sandeep Singh and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another  Respondents     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. P.S. Miglani, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 #
$% "& Report dated 27.07.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Mohan Singh and the accused persons namely Sandeep Singh, Harpreet Singh and Jaspal Kaur, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.16 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in '()* #(*+, - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4!

%&   %4(5(*)6& 7 and '8069(*3/4 #(*+, )*3 .,/4: - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4!

 %&   %4(5(*)6& $ the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.111 dated 02.05.2013 registered at Police Station Dakha, District Ludhiana under Sections 452/323/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

%  #
&     #/;./52/4$

7
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.16 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court