High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39779/2016disposed of

Mamta v. State Of Haryana And Others

2016-11-08Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39779-2016 Date of decision: 08.11.2016 Mamta

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for directing respondents No.1 & 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondent No.4 as well as to take an action on the representation that has been filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondent No.4, the husband of the petitioner is harassing her and even a Panchayat was convened wherein the said respondent promised to change his behaviour. Apart from illtreating and harassing her, she was also thrown out from her matrimonial home and she was residing separately thereafter. However, the respondent continues to harass the petitioner. Thereafter an application has been moved to respondent No.2, however, no action has been taken on the representation moved so far. The limited prayer by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the present moment is that respondents No.2 & 3 be directed to take action on the representation so moved expeditiously. Notice of motion.

Satyawan 2016.11.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-39779-2016 -2On the asking of the Court, Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana, has accepted notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has supplied two copies of the petition to him. Counsel appearing appearing on behalf of the respondent-State fairly states that the representation so moved by the petitioner will be looked into and action if so required will be taken expeditiously. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation so moved by the petitioner and take appropriate action, if so required, as per law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

08.11.2016 (JAISHREE THAKUR) sp JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2016.11.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh