Icici Bank Limited & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS




    
    

 ! Date of decision: 25th February, 2016  ICICI Bank Limited and others Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another Respondents  "  #$  %
  %
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 %
& $! Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his client has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition however reserving rights of the petitioners to rake up all these issues at a subsequent stage in case of any eventuality. Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

 %
!  

'()*+),-&

.
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.27 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court