Tamanna And Another v. State Of Haryana & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-40015 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : September 12, 2018 Tamanna and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Nishant Raj Ghangas, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have filed this petition seeking protection of their lives and liberty alleging that they are major and have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 7, who are father, brother and other relatives of petitioner No. 1. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, petitioner No. 1 moved representation dated 09.09.2018 (Annexure P-5) to Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat. He confines the relief claimed in this petition for direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation of petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law. In view of above submission of learned counsel for petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.

2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to look into the representation dated 09.09.2018 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) September 12, 2018 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jyoti 2018.09.