Parminder Kaur v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-40105 of 2018 .....

Date of decision:13.9.2018 Parminder Kaur

...Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0005 dated 22.6.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Punjab State Crime Home Station, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali). Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Ms. Monika Jalota, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and accepts notice and Mr. Vikrant Duggal, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.14 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-40105 of 2018 [2] From the record, I find that the earlier anticipatory bail petition of the present petitioner has already been dismissed by this Court on merit vide order dated 27.8.2018 by holding that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation in view of the fraud committed with so many people and no ground was made out for granting benefit of anticipatory bail to her. This order has been passed just about 15 days earlier and again second petition has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner without any changed circumstances. Rather, it has been stated that the petitioner has sufficient land for allotment etc. As there is no changed circumstance after the passing of the earlier order, therefore, no ground is made out for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case. The petitioner is required for custodial interrogation, hence, I do not find any merit in this petition and the same is dismissed.

September 13, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.14 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh