Hari Singh And ORS. v. Uhbvn And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9972-2003 Date of decision : 13.01.2016 Hari Singh & Anr.

........... Petitioners Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors.

........... Respondents Coram :

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. I.D. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Poonia, Advocate, for the respondents.

*** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (oral) Counsel for the respondent has submitted that since the petitioner himself has approached the respondent stating that he has been given tubewell connection, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents, this petition may be dismissed as infructuous but he has no instructions.

Dismissed as infructuous.

In case, the statement made by counsel for the respondents is found to be incorrect, the petitioner may file an application for revival of this petition.

(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 13.01.2016 JUDGE sp SATYAWAN 2016.01.15 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh