← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/3929/2015allowed

Panjab v. State Of Haryana

2015-03-09Mr. Justice V.S. Aggarwal2 pages

CRM No.M-3929 of 2015 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-3929 of 2015 Date of Decision:- 09.03.2015 Panjab .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR

Present:

Mr. S.S. Kharb, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State.

**** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) The petitioner has preferred the instant petition for the grant of anticipatory bail, in a case registered against him along with his co-accused, vide FIR No.190 dated 26.05.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 148, 364 and 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and Section 25 of The Arms Act, by the police of Police Station Gannaur, District Sonepat.

2.

Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable assistance and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition for anticipatory bail deserves to be accepted in this context.

NARESH KUMAR 2011.04.13 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-3929 of 2015 -24.

What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the petitioner was granted the concession of pre-arrest bail, by means of order dated 02.07.2014 in CRM-M No. 8678 of 2014 by this Court. On 13.01.2015, he could not appear, an application for exemption of his personal presence filed on his behalf was dismissed and the trial Court has issued non-bailable warrants of arrest against him. Moreover, during the course of preliminary hearing, the petitioner was directed to appear/surrender and the trial Court was directed to admit him to interim (provisional) bail, subject to his depositing an amount of Rs.10,000/- as costs and on filing a specific affidavit that he will regularly appear in the Court in future, by means of order dated February 06, 2015, by this Court. 5.

At the very outset, learned counsel has placed on record the certified copy of order dated 10.02.2015, which would reveal that the petitioner has already deposited the costs of Rs.10,000, filed the affidavit and the bail & surety bonds furnished by him, in pursuance of the pointed order of this Court, were attested and accepted by the trial Court. 6.

In the light of aforesaid reasons, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is accepted. The interim (provisional) bail already granted to the petitioner, by virtue of indicated order by this Court, is hereby made absolute.

March 09, 2015 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2011.04.13 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh