Sushil Katyal v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 39368 of 2017 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- July 12, 2018 Sushil Katyal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Gourave Bhayyia Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Garima Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner Sushil Katyal has since expired. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant.
It being so, this petition is disposed of accordingly being infructuous.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE July 12, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.07.13 09:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh