M/S K.K. Conclave & ORS v. Smt. Bimlesh Mangla
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-39369 of 2017 Date of Decision: 19.07.2019 M/s K.K. Conclave and others
...Petitioners
VERSUS
Smt. Bimlesh Manlga
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Tejeshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Ravneet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Keshav Partap Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for petitioners submits that against the summoning order passed by the trial Court, petitioners have filed revision, which was accepted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal and complaint was ordered to be dismissed. Thereafter, learned trial Court is still proceeding with the complaint.
I have perused order dated 31.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Magistrate Ist Class, Palwal, which takes note that order dated 29.08.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge was brought to his notice and the case was fixed for 18.09.2017 only for awaiting the file. Order in compliance of order passed by Additional Sessions Judge is to be passed in main case file and there is nothing that Court is insisting on presence of petitioners.
This petition is disposed of with direction to trial Court to passed necessary order in the complainant as per order of learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 29.08.2017.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) July 19, 2019 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2019.07.22 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh