Ravi Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22130-2022 Date of Decision:-14.09.2022 RAVI KUMAR ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s) -.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana.

-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case having FIR No.2 dated 2.1.2022 registered under Section 379-A IPC (Section 379-B IPC added later on) at Police Station City Yamunanagar District Yamunanagar. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has joined the proceedings in the trial Court on the basis of order interim bail dated 23.5.2022.

State counsel on instructions from SI Kushal Pal Singh has not disputed the aforesaid assertions made by the counsel for the petitioner. The PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.09.15 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

( 2 ) CRM-M-22130-2022 State counsel has further submitted that now the petitioner is not required by the police as challan has already been presented in the Court concerned. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and order of interim bail dated 23.5.2022 is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioner should abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( KARAMJIT SINGH) 14.09.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.09.15 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment