High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/42137/2013dismissed

Veena Aggarwal & ORS v. Chandan Munjal

2015-09-10Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

Crl. Misc.-M No. 42137 of 2013 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc.-M No. 42137 of 2013 Date of Decision: 10.9.2015.

Veena Aggarwal and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Chandan Munjal .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the respondent.

**** SABINA, J.

Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to take up all the pleas available to them before the Trial Court during trial .

Dismissed as withdrawn.

However, personal appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court, during trial, shall remain exempted subject to the following conditions:- i.

petitioners shall be represented through counsel; ii.

shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings;

iii.

shall not dispute their identity as accused;

iv.

shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in their absence but in the presence of their counsel;

GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.11 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Crl. Misc.-M No. 42137 of 2013 -2v.

shall appear before the Trial Court as and when required by the Trial Court;

vi.

any other condition which the learned Trial Court may impose.

(SABINA) JUDGE September 10, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.11 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document