High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/5927/2021disposed of

Kavita Devi v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-06-30Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.112 CRWP No.5927 of 2021 Date of Decision: 30.06.2021 Kavita Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioners.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) By way of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect her as well as her relatives' lives and liberty as she apprehends threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5, i.e. her husband and brother-in-law respectively and their associates. It has also been mentioned in this petition that a representation (Annexure P-2) has already been moved to respondent No.2 in this regard.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Mr. Apoorv Garg, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case, in pursuance of the copies of this petition having been NEETU RANI 2021.06.30 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRWP No.5927 of 2021 -2- ......

sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice on behalf of these respondents.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer to the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 only to look into and take appropriate action on the said representation of the petitioner, i.e. Annexure P-2.

Learned State counsel has no objection for the same. Accordingly, keeping in view the above-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter in dispute, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, is hereby directed to look into the said representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) and if it is found that the petitioner as well as her relatives genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

This petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 30.06.2021 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETU RANI 2021.06.30 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC