Anoop Singh @ Anoopa v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-39398-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39398-2015 Date of Decision: November 30, 2015 Anoop Singh @ Anoopa ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the above prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to learned trial Court to expedite the trial since the FIR is dated 13.06.2012 and MEENU 2015.11.30 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-39398-2015 -2thereafter, the petitioner was arrested on 02.09.2013 and is continuously languishing in jail for the last more than two years. November 30, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.11.30 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh