Manoj Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10382 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.12.2020.
Manoj Kumar
...Petitioner
V/S State of Haryana &Ors.
....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :
Ms. Amrita Garg, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harsh Vardhan, AAG Haryana.
Mr. Satyam Tandon, Advocate For respondents No.2 and 3.
(Presence marked through video conference).
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 submits that alternative remedy appeal has also been preferred by the petitioner, during the pendency of the instant petition.
In the premise, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. During pendency of appeal, interim order granted by this Court qua staying the reversion of the petitioner, shall continue to operate.
December 16, 2020 (ARUN MONGA) Jiten JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No SONU 2020.12.16 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document