Dharambir v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39716 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- December 11, 2017 Dharambir

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, AAG, Haryana.

*** Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has since joined the investigation and recovery of Danda has also been effected from him. He has furnished an affidavit that he is not holding any Passport. The injury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature alleged to have been caused with a Danda. It being so, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not found to be necessary. Three of his co-accused are said to have been granted regular bail by Additional Sessions Juge, Rewari vide order dated 13.11.2017. Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 25.10.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE December 11, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.12.11 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh