Sanjeev Goyal And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

Crl. Misc. No. M-39768 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-39768 of 2017 Date of Decision: 9.10.2018 Sanjeev Goyal and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 88 dated 22.9.2017, registered under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station Women Cell, Ludhiana. Counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to the order dated 25.10.2017, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation.

State counsel states that the petitioners have joined the investigation. He further states that an enquiry was held by AIG, Crime and the petitioners have been declared innocent and they would be filing a cancellation report.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 25.10.2017 GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.10 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-39768 of 2017 -2granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE October 09, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.10 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh