Dalwinder Singh @ Dalora v. State Of Haryana And ANR

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-39750 of 2015 .....

Date of decision:22.3.2016 Dalwinder Singh alias Dalora .....Petitioner v.

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents ....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Brijesh Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

None for complainant-respondent No.2.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.150 dated 10.5.2013 (Annexure-P.1) registered for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 148, 149, 452 and 506 IPC at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise (Annexure-P.4). The FIR has been registered on the statement of complainantBalraj Singh alias Vicky on the allegations that the accused-petitioner attacked him and inflicted injuries. Now with the intervention of respectable persons, the matter has been amicably compromised between the parties and they have resolved their disputes and differences. Keeping in view the fact that the parties have entered into a

Cr. Misc. No.M-39750 of 2015 [2] compromise, they were directed to appear before learned trial Court for getting their statements recorded in support of the compromise. After doing the needful, learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sirsa, has sent her report dated 5.1.2016 submitting that the compromise arrived at between the parties is without any pressure or coercion from any one and the same is genuine one.

Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from the Investigating Officer admits the factum of compromise and submits that in case the parties have indeed settled their dispute, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana and have gone through the record.

In a decision, based on compromise, none of the parties is a loser. Rather, compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak.

Therefore, keeping in view the fact that the matter has been amicably settled and in view of the law laid by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Cr.) 543, this

Cr. Misc. No.M-39750 of 2015 [3] petition is allowed and FIR No.150 dated 10.5.2013 (Annexure-P.1) registered for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 148, 149, 452 and 506 IPC at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. March 22, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp*