Satinderpal Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M-3986 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CRM-M-3986 of 2017 Date of Decision: 17.04.2017 Satinderpal Singh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent 2.

CRM-M-4943 of 2017 Karamjit Singh and others ....Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. K.S. Sidhu , Advocate for petitioners in both the petitions.

Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners in case FIR No. 11 dated 18.01.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 406 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), at Police Station Patran, District Patiala.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he has instructions to submit that parties have amicably settled the dispute pertaining to FIR in question and other matters pending between the parties. Jitender Kumar 2017.04.18 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-3986 of 2017 -2Learned State counsel also submits that parties have given copy of compromise to the Investigating Officer and the offence punishable under Section 406 IPC is compoundable. She further submits that petitioners have joined the investigation under orders dated 08.02.2017 and 16.02.2017 passed in respective petitions and their custodial interrogation is no more required.

In view of above but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and orders dated 08.02.2017 and 16.02.2017 passed in respective petitions are made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

April 17, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.04.18 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH