Ajay Singh Tanwar And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-M-18943-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18943-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.07.2025 AJAY SINGH TANWAR AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-26638-2025 Allowed as prayed for and original copy of affidavit of the complainant (Annexure A-1) is taken on record.

Main case 1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0007 dated 25.01.2025 under Sections 318(4), 61 of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime Rohtak, District Rohtak alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Ms. Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

Sonia Puri 2025.08.05 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-18943-2025 (O&M) -24.

Mrs. Santosh Bhardwaj, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 by way of filing of Power of Attorney which is taken on record and confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of FIR in question.

5.

Learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise. He further states that the petitioner is not involved in any other case.

6.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record.

7.

In view of the above, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences, therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 8.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.07 dated 25.01.2025 under Sections 318(4), 61 of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime Rohtak, District Rohtak alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the High Court Legal Services Committee. 10.

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise.

(H.S. GREWAL) 17.07.2025 JUDGE Sonia Puri Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.08.05 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document