Vipin Singhal & ANR. v. State Of Haryana & ANR.




    
      Date of decision: 31st July, 2015  Vipin Singhal and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Ms. Ritam Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Jagdish Chand.

for respondent No.1.

Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 
!"

# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.286 dated 08.10.2014 registered at Police Station Sector 56, Gurgaon under Sections 420/406/4988A/506/34 IPC and sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.06 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

Vide order dated 26.11.2014 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioners were granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
Learned Counsel for both the sides submit that the parties have complied with the directions issued vide order dated 10.12.2014 and nothing survives except getting the matter quashed and they have no objection in allowing bail to the petitioners. In this view of the matter, being a pure matrimonial dispute which has been resolved, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 26.11.2014 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. "

 
#   $%&'! (  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.06 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court